Adverb Highlighter

Paste an English draft and the tool highlights words ending in -ly, then shows the total matches and the unique list. It catches likely adverbs such as quickly, really, basically, carefully and technically, but it is a suffix highlighter rather than a grammar parser: non-ly adverbs such as very, quite, just, now and here are not detected, and false positives such as family, bully and holy still need a human check.

How to review -ly words in English text

  1. 1

    Paste the full English draft

    Drop in a paragraph, chapter or full article. The tool scans for word tokens whose letters end in -ly.

  2. 2

    Review the bracketed matches

    The result shows a total count, a unique list and your text with each -ly match bracketed.

  3. 3

    Separate adverbs from false positives

    Likely adverbs such as quickly and technically are useful editing signals; words such as family, bully and holy are just suffix matches.

  4. 4

    Edit with context

    Rewrite weak -ly adverbs when a stronger verb or adjective works better, and make a separate manual pass for non-ly adverbs such as very, quite and just.

What this tool actually detects

Match type Examples How to review
Manner adverbs quickly, softly, carefully Often worth rewriting if the verb can carry more force
Degree or filler adverbs really, basically, extremely Often removable, especially before adjectives or weak verbs
Necessary qualifiers legally, technically, arguably Keep when accuracy or nuance depends on them
Connectors and sequence words consequently, finally, similarly Usually keep when they guide the reader
False positives family, bully, holy Ignore unless the word is actually functioning as an adverb in context

What it misses

Not detected Examples Why
Non-ly English adverbs very, quite, just, now, here, often, always The tool only checks the -ly ending
Non-English adverb patterns schnell, rápidamente, doucement, lentamente German, Spanish, French, Italian and other languages need their own detection rules
Grammar roles adjective vs. adverb usage The tool does not parse grammar; it only matches a suffix

The Stephen King rule, with a caveat

“The road to hell is paved with adverbs.” The practical version here is narrower: use the -ly list as a checklist for weak modifiers, not as a verdict. “She ran quickly” often becomes tighter as “She sprinted”; “It was really cold” may become “It was freezing.” But legally, technically or consequently may be exactly the word the sentence needs.

A practical review workflow

Do not delete mechanically:

  • Read each bracketed -ly word in its sentence.
  • Cut it only when the replacement is clearer or stronger.
  • Ignore false positives such as family, bully and holy.
  • Run a separate manual pass for non-ly adverbs such as very, quite, just, now and here.

Frequently Asked Questions

Technically, it counts any word ending in -ly. That catches many English adverbs (quickly, really, basically, carefully), but it is not a dictionary or grammar parser, so false positives such as “family,” “bully” and “holy” can appear.

No. Really, basically and extremely are often worth questioning, but legally, technically, consequently and similar words may be necessary. Decide from the sentence, not from the count alone.

No. Those are common English adverbs, but they do not end in -ly, so this tool will not mark them. Check them manually after the suffix pass.

No. The matcher only looks for words ending in the letters -ly. German adverbs (schnell, leicht), Spanish -mente adverbs (rápidamente), French -ment adverbs and other language patterns need different rules and are not supported.

Related Tools